Overview of Companies Act 2016 Audit Framework

The Companies Act 2016 established Malaysia's modern corporate governance framework, introducing comprehensive audit requirements for incorporated entities while providing specific exemptions for smaller enterprises. Under Section 266 of the Act, every company must appoint an approved company auditor to audit its financial statements for each financial year, unless specifically exempted under prescribed criteria.

The audit requirement serves multiple stakeholder interests, including regulatory oversight, investor protection, creditor assurance, and market transparency. However, recognizing the disproportionate compliance burden on smaller enterprises, the Act provides for specific exemptions administered through Practice Directives issued by the Companies Commission of Malaysia.

Practice Directive 10/2024: New Exemption Framework

Effective Implementation

Practice Directive No. 10/2024, titled "Qualifying Criteria For Audit Exemption For Certain Private Companies In Malaysia," becomes effective for financial reporting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2025. This directive replaces Practice Directive No. 3/2017, introducing substantially revised thresholds designed to maximize SME benefits from audit exemption.

Revised Qualifying Criteria

Under the new framework, private companies qualify for audit exemption by meeting any two of the following three criteria for the current financial year and the immediate past two financial years:

  • Revenue Threshold: Annual income does not exceed RM3 million
  • Asset Threshold: Total assets do not exceed RM3 million
  • Employee Threshold: Total number of employees does not exceed 30

Comparison with Previous Criteria

The new thresholds represent significant increases from Practice Directive 3/2017:

  • Revenue Increase: From RM1 million to RM3 million (200% increase)
  • Asset Increase: From RM1 million to RM3 million (200% increase)
  • Employee Increase: From 5 employees to 30 employees (500% increase)

This substantial expansion aligns with similar jurisdictions including Singapore, United Kingdom, and Australia, reflecting Malaysia's commitment to reducing regulatory burden on smaller enterprises.

Three-Year Consistency Requirement

Historical Performance Assessment

Companies must demonstrate compliance with chosen thresholds for three consecutive years: the current financial year and the immediate past two financial years. This requirement ensures that audit exemption applies to genuinely small companies rather than those experiencing temporary downturns or restructuring.

Practical Implementation Examples

For companies seeking exemption for financial year ending December 31, 2027:

  • Assessment Period: FYE 2025, FYE 2026, and FYE 2027
  • Qualifying Criteria: Any two of the three thresholds must be met across all three years
  • Documentation Required: Financial statements and records supporting threshold compliance

Professional Accountant Requirement

Mandatory Professional Involvement

Companies applying for audit exemption must engage professional accountants qualified under the Accountants Act 1967 to:

  • Prepare and compile financial statements
  • Confirm compliance with approved accounting standards
  • Provide statutory declarations regarding exemption eligibility
  • Ensure financial statements meet prescribed format and content requirements

Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) Members

Eligible professional accountants must be MIA members in good standing with appropriate practicing certificates. This requirement ensures professional competence and regulatory oversight even for exempt companies, maintaining stakeholder confidence in financial reporting quality.

Categories of Audit Exempt Companies

Dormant Companies

Companies with no significant accounting transactions during the financial year, typically holding companies or special purpose vehicles with minimal activity. Dormant status must be consistently maintained to qualify for exemption.

Zero-Revenue Companies

Companies generating no revenue during the assessment period, subject to asset thresholds. Under Practice Directive 10/2024, the asset threshold increases from RM300,000 to RM500,000 for zero-revenue companies.

Threshold-Qualified Companies

The largest category, comprising companies meeting the standard two-of-three criteria framework. This represents the primary beneficiary group of the revised thresholds, potentially encompassing thousands of Malaysian SMEs previously required to undergo statutory audits.

Exclusions from Audit Exemption

Prohibited Company Types

Certain company categories remain ineligible for audit exemption regardless of size thresholds:

  • Public Companies: All companies limited by shares with public shareholders
  • Subsidiaries of Public Companies: Any company controlled by a public company
  • Licensed Entities: Companies holding licenses requiring audited financial statements
  • Financial Institutions: Banks, insurance companies, and regulated financial entities
  • Investment Companies: Entities primarily engaged in investment activities

Regulatory and Contractual Requirements

Even eligible companies may be practically required to maintain audited statements due to:

  • Banking facility covenants requiring audited financials
  • Shareholder agreements mandating annual audits
  • Major supplier or customer requirements
  • Joint venture or partnership obligations
  • Government contract compliance requirements

Strategic Implications for Malaysian SMEs

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Companies must evaluate audit exemption benefits against potential disadvantages:

Benefits of Exemption:

  • Cost Savings: Elimination of annual audit fees, typically RM10,000-50,000 for SMEs
  • Time Efficiency: Reduced year-end preparation and audit coordination requirements
  • Management Focus: More time for core business activities rather than audit compliance
  • Simplified Reporting: Reduced documentation and working paper requirements

Potential Disadvantages:

  • Stakeholder Confidence: Reduced credibility with lenders, investors, and business partners
  • Internal Control Gaps: Loss of independent review and control recommendations
  • Compliance Risk: Reduced oversight of accounting and reporting accuracy
  • Market Access: Potential barriers to business opportunities requiring audited statements

Industry-Specific Considerations

Different industries face varying implications from audit exemption eligibility:

Manufacturing and Trading:

  • Supply chain partners may require audited statements for credit terms
  • Export financing often necessitates audited financial information
  • Inventory valuation accuracy becomes more critical without independent verification

Professional Services:

  • Client confidence may depend on demonstrated financial stability through audits
  • Professional indemnity insurance may require audited statements
  • Partnership arrangements often mandate independent financial verification

Technology and Startups:

  • Investor due diligence typically requires audited financial statements
  • Government grants and incentive programs may mandate audit compliance
  • Intellectual property valuations benefit from independent verification

Compliance Process and Documentation

Application Procedures

Companies seeking audit exemption must follow prescribed application processes:

  1. Threshold Assessment: Calculate and document compliance with any two of the three criteria
  2. Professional Engagement: Retain qualified MIA member to prepare financial statements
  3. Documentation Preparation: Compile supporting evidence for threshold compliance
  4. Statutory Declaration: Professional accountant confirmation of compliance and standard adherence
  5. Filing Submission: Submit exemption application with required documentation

Record Keeping Requirements

Exempt companies must maintain comprehensive records supporting exemption eligibility:

  • Financial Records: Complete accounting records supporting revenue and asset calculations
  • Employment Records: Payroll and HR documentation supporting employee count claims
  • Professional Documentation: Engagement letters and completion certificates from MIA members
  • Board Resolutions: Corporate approvals for exemption applications and financial statement adoption

Transition Considerations for 2025 Implementation

Existing Audit Arrangements

Companies currently undergoing audits must carefully plan the transition to exemption status:

  • Audit Completion: Complete ongoing audit engagements before exemption application
  • Auditor Communication: Professional termination of audit engagements with appropriate notice
  • Stakeholder Notification: Inform relevant parties about change in audit status
  • Alternative Assurance: Consider review or compilation engagements for stakeholder confidence

System and Process Adjustments

Implementation of exemption status requires operational changes:

  • Revised year-end procedures without audit requirements
  • Enhanced internal review processes to maintain accuracy
  • Updated board and management reporting procedures
  • Modified shareholder communication regarding financial statements

Regulatory Oversight and Monitoring

CCM Supervision

The Companies Commission maintains oversight responsibilities for exempt companies:

  • Compliance Monitoring: Random reviews of exemption eligibility documentation
  • Threshold Verification: Validation of claimed compliance with prescribed criteria
  • Professional Standards: Monitoring of MIA member performance in exemption engagements
  • Market Protection: Ensuring exemption framework serves legitimate policy objectives

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Companies providing false information or failing to meet exemption criteria face potential penalties:

  • Revocation of exemption status with retrospective audit requirements
  • Financial penalties for misleading declarations
  • Enhanced scrutiny for future exemption applications
  • Potential prosecution for serious compliance failures

International Benchmarking

Regional Comparison

Malaysia's revised thresholds align with international best practices:

  • Singapore: S$10 million revenue or S$10 million assets
  • Australia: A$1 million revenue and 50 employees
  • United Kingdom: £10.2 million turnover, £5.1 million assets, or 50 employees
  • Hong Kong: HK$50 million assets and HK$100 million revenue

Economic Context

The substantial threshold increases reflect Malaysia's economic development and inflation adjustments since previous revisions. The changes acknowledge SME growth and the need for proportionate regulatory burden relative to company size and economic contribution.

Future Developments and Considerations

Periodic Review Expectations

CCM typically reviews exemption criteria every 5-7 years to ensure relevance and effectiveness. Future considerations may include:

  • Inflation adjustments to threshold amounts
  • Additional or revised qualifying criteria
  • Industry-specific exemption frameworks
  • Enhanced professional standards for exempt company reporting

Technology and Digitalization Impact

Emerging trends affecting audit exemption framework:

  • Digital Reporting: Enhanced electronic filing and monitoring capabilities
  • Data Analytics: Automated compliance monitoring and threshold verification
  • Blockchain Technology: Potential for immutable record keeping and verification
  • AI-Powered Assurance: Alternative forms of independent verification for exempt companies

Best Practice Recommendations

Decision-Making Framework

Companies should follow systematic evaluation processes when considering exemption:

  1. Stakeholder Analysis: Identify all parties requiring audited statements
  2. Cost-Benefit Assessment: Quantify financial and operational impact of exemption
  3. Risk Evaluation: Assess potential negative consequences of audit cessation
  4. Alternative Solutions: Consider review or compilation engagements as middle ground
  5. Professional Consultation: Engage qualified advisors for guidance on optimal approaches

Implementation Best Practices

Successful exemption implementation requires attention to:

  • Communication Strategy: Proactive stakeholder engagement about exemption decision
  • Internal Controls: Enhanced procedures to maintain financial reporting accuracy
  • Professional Standards: Engagement of qualified MIA members for financial statement preparation
  • Documentation Management: Comprehensive record keeping supporting exemption eligibility
  • Periodic Review: Regular assessment of exemption benefits and continued eligibility

Professional Advisory Considerations

Auditor Transition

Companies transitioning from audited to exempt status should:

  • Provide appropriate notice to existing auditors
  • Complete ongoing audit engagements professionally
  • Obtain management letters and recommendations before cessation
  • Consider maintaining relationships for potential future audit needs

Alternative Professional Services

Exempt companies may benefit from alternative professional services:

  • Compilation Engagements: Professional preparation of financial statements without audit opinion
  • Review Engagements: Limited assurance procedures providing moderate confidence
  • Agreed-Upon Procedures: Specific procedures addressing stakeholder requirements
  • Internal Control Reviews: Independent assessment of control environments

Conclusion

Practice Directive 10/2024 represents a significant advancement in Malaysia's approach to proportionate corporate regulation, substantially expanding audit exemption eligibility for private companies. The revised thresholds acknowledge the growth and sophistication of Malaysian SMEs while maintaining appropriate safeguards through professional accountant involvement and regulatory oversight.

Companies eligible for exemption must carefully evaluate the strategic implications, considering both the immediate benefits of reduced compliance costs and the potential long-term consequences for stakeholder relationships and business opportunities. The decision requires comprehensive analysis of business circumstances, stakeholder requirements, and strategic objectives.

Professional advisory support remains essential for navigating the exemption framework effectively, ensuring compliance with application requirements, and maintaining appropriate financial reporting standards even in the absence of statutory audit obligations. The success of the revised framework will depend on balanced implementation that achieves policy objectives while maintaining market confidence in Malaysian corporate governance standards.

As Malaysia continues to develop its corporate regulatory framework, the expanded audit exemption criteria represent an important milestone in supporting SME growth while maintaining appropriate governance and transparency standards. Companies should approach exemption decisions strategically, with full consideration of their unique circumstances and stakeholder requirements.

Let us know how we can help
Start the conversation